I can look at the Dev Log for 3.9.1 at Dev log for 3.9.1 but the Log for 3.9.2 at Dev log for 3.9.2 now says it is inaccessible. Is this a mistake? Or is this a change of policy? Or am I looking in the wrong place?
Cheers Andy
I can look at the Dev Log for 3.9.1 at Dev log for 3.9.1 but the Log for 3.9.2 at Dev log for 3.9.2 now says it is inaccessible. Is this a mistake? Or is this a change of policy? Or am I looking in the wrong place?
Cheers Andy
That is strange. It works for me and the link is correct. Can someone else confirm? @phillxnet @ganti_priya
The link woks for me as well, no problem
Tried the given link just now and it was OK but only in chrome. The same link in Firefox fails, or rather fails over to not a known thread page:
âOops! That page doesnât exist or is private.â
Both fairly modern versions:
Chrome: Version 60.0.3112.101 (Official Build) (64-bit))
Firefox: 55.0.1 (64-bit)
Both run on Fedora 26.
So yes thatâs strange but hopefully helps to narrow down whatâs going on there.
On this note I have Chrome logged in with my forum account but in Firefox I donât. Also it looks to me like
is actually a message (envelope icon to the left of itâs title) rather than a post, could it have inadvertently been changed over from a regular post?
@Flyer was the browser session you used logged in with your forum account?
Yes - I am using Firefox.(54.0.1 - 64-bit) and that gives âSorry, you donât have access to that topic!â MS Edge gives âOops! That page doesnât exist or is privateâ This is running on Windows 10.
Oddly, I believe I looked at the topic previously not long after it was created.
Oh and the Firefox session is logged in to my accountâŠ
@ajk Yes I now suspect it has inadvertently got marked as a message rather than a public post. I think I still see it via forum moderator rights.
@suman I have a spanner here âTopic Admin Actionsâ that offers âMake Public Topicâ but never had to use that before. Could it be that post pinning this got changed to a message?
Yes it was definitely public for a bit as it has a number of commentators, including @glenngould.
@suman looks to me like itâs now a message with only the prior contributors as members, hence @glenngould being able to see it. @chipped is also listed likewise, and me as it goes.
@ajk @Flyer @glenngould and @suman
OK, itâs sorted. Looks like a minor mishap put that thread into message mode. Iâve now âun-messagedâ it so it should be public again.
Sorry for the delay folks.
Works for me now - thanks!
@ajk Thanks for the confirmation. Iâll try and keep a better eye on these forum post config issues in the future.
Cheers for the head up.